Comments on: Best encoding settings for Viddler and others http://djsteen.com/wp/2009/02/07/best-video-encoding-2009/ Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:40:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: free satellite uk http://djsteen.com/wp/2009/02/07/best-video-encoding-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-715 free satellite uk Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:09:36 +0000 http://djsteen.com/wp/?p=183#comment-715 Development of digital technologies occurs prompt rates. Does not lag behind progress and digital TV. Speaking about digital TV, we first of all mean satellite TV. The digital satellite TV becomes more and more accessible to simple users. The market paid satellite tv also is not necessary on a place. The new digital standard of TV of high clearness HDTV actively develops and takes root. The satellite TV becomes more and more directed on the spectator. Besides digital quality of the image, advantage of satellite systems also is also the extensive cover zone of the companion. Development of digital technologies occurs prompt rates. Does not lag behind progress and digital TV. Speaking about digital TV, we first of all mean satellite TV. The digital satellite TV becomes more and more accessible to simple users. The market paid satellite tv also is not necessary on a place. The new digital standard of TV of high clearness HDTV actively develops and takes root. The satellite TV becomes more and more directed on the spectator. Besides digital quality of the image, advantage of satellite systems also is also the extensive cover zone of the companion.

]]> By: Jayson Bryant http://djsteen.com/wp/2009/02/07/best-video-encoding-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-669 Jayson Bryant Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:59:49 +0000 http://djsteen.com/wp/?p=183#comment-669 Thanks for the helpfull advice as I have had endless trouble getting the quality right for both. I now use MPEG-4 and have seen a dramatic increase in quality.<br>Thanks<br>Jayson Thanks for the helpfull advice as I have had endless trouble getting the quality right for both. I now use MPEG-4 and have seen a dramatic increase in quality.
Thanks
Jayson

]]> By: djsteen http://djsteen.com/wp/2009/02/07/best-video-encoding-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-635 djsteen Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:37:45 +0000 http://djsteen.com/wp/?p=183#comment-635 Oh dear. 16:9 widescreen (anamorphic) is even more confusing.<br><br>You're either dealing with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAL" rel="nofollow">PAL</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTSC" rel="nofollow">NTSC</a>. It sounds like you're using the latter (NTSC) Basically, when you record in widescreen on a camcorder that doesn't do HD it is cropping and stretching the video a little bit. <br><br>When you import the video in to Sony Vegas you have to tell it that it's NTSC widescreen, and edit it in that format. I've only used Sony Vegas a couple of times, but I assume it's the same as most other pro apps.<br>Here's an explanation on <a href="http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/understanding_16_9.html" rel="nofollow">how 16:9 widescreen works in Final Cut Pro</a>.<br><br>I have experimented with 16:9 video on my old MiniDV camcorder. As far as I remember, the pixel ratio I exported at was <b>720x405</b>. Weird ratio, but it looked decent here: <a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/djsteen/videos/164/" rel="nofollow">viddler.com/explore/djsteen/videos/164</a> Oh dear. 16:9 widescreen (anamorphic) is even more confusing.

You're either dealing with PAL or NTSC. It sounds like you're using the latter (NTSC) Basically, when you record in widescreen on a camcorder that doesn't do HD it is cropping and stretching the video a little bit.

When you import the video in to Sony Vegas you have to tell it that it's NTSC widescreen, and edit it in that format. I've only used Sony Vegas a couple of times, but I assume it's the same as most other pro apps.
Here's an explanation on how 16:9 widescreen works in Final Cut Pro.

I have experimented with 16:9 video on my old MiniDV camcorder. As far as I remember, the pixel ratio I exported at was 720×405. Weird ratio, but it looked decent here: viddler.com/explore/djsteen/videos/164

]]> By: Jason http://djsteen.com/wp/2009/02/07/best-video-encoding-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-632 Jason Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:29:21 +0000 http://djsteen.com/wp/?p=183#comment-632 What about cameras that shoot in 16:9 but that aren't HD? The final videos are coming out at 720 x 480 in AVI format after editing them in Sony Vegas. When I convert them to FLV, I don't know what size to set it at in order to fill up the viddler player. Please help. What about cameras that shoot in 16:9 but that aren't HD? The final videos are coming out at 720 x 480 in AVI format after editing them in Sony Vegas. When I convert them to FLV, I don't know what size to set it at in order to fill up the viddler player. Please help.

]]> By: djsteen http://djsteen.com/wp/2009/02/07/best-video-encoding-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-626 djsteen Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:14:37 +0000 http://djsteen.com/wp/?p=183#comment-626 I'm holding you to that! Up the top of the <a href="http://www.q1.com.au" rel="nofollow">Q1</a>! I'm holding you to that! Up the top of the Q1!

]]> By: Mostly Lisa http://djsteen.com/wp/2009/02/07/best-video-encoding-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-624 Mostly Lisa Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:11:28 +0000 http://djsteen.com/wp/?p=183#comment-624 Thank you! I owe you like a huge piece of Lamington for this! Thank you! I owe you like a huge piece of Lamington for this!

]]>